Recent Comments
-
Recent Posts
-
Join 34 other subscribers
Archives
- December 2017
- July 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- August 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- August 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
Blogroll
Categories
- Analyzing Libertarianism
- Book Reports
- Climate Clusterfuck
- Economical Musings
- Executive Power
- Islam
- It's Just Business
- Laws
- Laws-Damned Laws-and Statists
- LMAO
- Perverse Incentives
- Policy
- Politics in General
- Recipes
- Research Blogging
- Street Photography
- Teaching
- The Democratic Process
- The Nanny State
- The Police State
- The Supremes
- TSA Fascists
- U.S. Presidency
- Uncategorized
- Washington Rules
Category Archives: The Supremes
Same-Sex Marriage, the Judiciary, and Democracy
My response to comments on my Same Sex Marriage Roundup post grew sufficiently in length that I decided to make it a post. ppnl asked, How do you feel about the fact that mostly this “new right” is being delivered … Continue reading
Posted in Laws, The Supremes
Tagged 9th Circuit, Hollingsworth v. Perry, Same-sex marriage, U.S. v. Windsor
28 Comments
The Media Are Morons (as usual)
The local Tim Hortons is a convenient place to grade papers. But it runs FoxNews continuously, and sometimes I can’t help but overhear the inanities of its talking heads. This morning some vaguely pretty blonde told me that the Supreme … Continue reading
Posted in Laws, The Supremes
Tagged 5th Circuit, Abortion, Breyer, Scalia, SCOTUS, Supreme Court, Texas Abortion Law
Comments Off on The Media Are Morons (as usual)
SCOTUS Takes Town Board Meetings Prayer Case
The Supreme Court has accepted a case asking the question of whether beginning a town board/city commission meeting with prayer violates the Establishment Clause. I’m surprised they’ve actually decided to do this, and worried that it’s only being taken because … Continue reading
Posted in The Supremes
Tagged Establishment Clause, First Amendment, Freedom from Religion, Freedom of Religion, Galloway, Greece
5 Comments
The DOMA Decision
Since the world wouldn’t be complete without my two cents on the Supreme Court’s rulings in Windsor and Hollingsworth, it’s my duty to comment. First, DOMA
Posted in Laws, The Supremes
Tagged Defense of Marriage Act, DOMA, Hollingsworth v. Perry, Prop 8, Same-sex marriage, U.S. v. Windsor
31 Comments
The Prop 8 Punt
The world needs my input on contemporary issues, so… Second, Prop 8.
Posted in Laws, The Supremes
Tagged Defense of Marriage Act, DOMA, Hollingsworth v. Perry, Prop 8, Same-sex marriage, U.S. v. Windsor
20 Comments
Holding My Breath
Tomorrow? If not, then probably later this week the Supreme Court will finally release their DOMA and Prop 8 decisions. A fine sense of drama these Supremes have, but Amy Howe at Scotusblog explains why, as pure drama, the outcome … Continue reading
Posted in Laws, The Supremes
Tagged Defense of Marriage Act, DOMA, Hollingsworth v. Perry, Prop 8, Same-sex marriage, U.S. v. Windsor
5 Comments
Further Thoughts on Windsor (DOMA)
In addition to the procedural issues in the DOMA case that I discussed in my prior post, there was an interesting substantive point as well: federalism. Counsel for BLAG framed it this way: On the assumption that States have the … Continue reading
The Standing Question in U.S. v. Windsor
I’m a bit of a process geek, and in the U.S. v. Windsor case, the question of jurisdiction is really darn fascinating (if, that is, you’re a process geek). Here’s the quick background: New York residents Edith Windsor and Thea … Continue reading
Originalism as Infantilism
In a discussion about constitutional interpretation at another blog it suddenly struck me that originalism is a form of infantilism. What originalists long for is a single clear authoritative and unquestionable interpretation of what the Constitution means. And that’s really … Continue reading
Posted in The Supremes
11 Comments