Tag Archives: U.S. v. Windsor

Same-Sex Marriage, the Judiciary, and Democracy

My response to comments on my Same Sex Marriage Roundup post grew sufficiently in length that I decided to make it a post. ppnl asked, How do you feel about the fact that mostly this “new right” is being delivered … Continue reading

Posted in Laws, The Supremes | Tagged , , , | 28 Comments

The DOMA Decision

Since the world wouldn’t be complete without my two cents on the Supreme Court’s rulings in Windsor and Hollingsworth, it’s my duty to comment. First, DOMA

Posted in Laws, The Supremes | Tagged , , , , , | 31 Comments

The Prop 8 Punt

The world needs my input on contemporary issues, so… Second, Prop 8.

Posted in Laws, The Supremes | Tagged , , , , , | 20 Comments

Holding My Breath

Tomorrow? If not, then probably later this week the Supreme Court will finally release their DOMA and Prop 8 decisions. A fine sense of drama these Supremes have, but Amy Howe at Scotusblog explains why, as pure drama, the outcome … Continue reading

Posted in Laws, The Supremes | Tagged , , , , , | 5 Comments

SSM Cases Finally?

Scotusblog reports that they expect the Court to report new opinions tomorrow (Thursday) at 10:00 a.m. Perhaps we’ll finally get the DOMA and Prop 8 cases. The tension is getting to me like no other issue has before…and I’m straight. … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , ,

Further Thoughts on Windsor (DOMA)

In addition to the procedural issues in the DOMA case that I discussed in my prior post, there was an interesting substantive point as well: federalism. Counsel for BLAG framed it this way: On the assumption that States have the … Continue reading

Posted in Laws, The Supremes | Tagged , , | 6 Comments

The Standing Question in U.S. v. Windsor

I’m a bit of a process geek, and in the U.S. v. Windsor case, the question of jurisdiction is really darn fascinating (if, that is, you’re a process geek). Here’s the quick background: New York residents Edith Windsor and Thea … Continue reading

Posted in Laws, The Supremes | Tagged , , | 2 Comments